Thulium-Doped Fiber Laser and Its Application in Urinary Lithotripsy

Thulium-doped fiber laser (TFL)-based urological lithotripsy has emerged as a promising technology for treating urological stones in new era of endourological options. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the characteristics of TFL application for lithotripsy and to analyze the research progress of two crucial TFL light sources, quasi-continuous (QCW) TFL and main oscillation power amplification (MOPA) TFL.

Methods

The data about the potential efficiency of TFL in clinical applications and the status of pulsed TFL studies were gathered through a manual search of TFL-related literature in the SCI, SSCI, A&HCI, IE, PubMed databases to assess the performance issues associated with application of thulium laser for urinary tract stone surgery.

Results

TFLs can ablate stones mainly through photothermal and micro-explosive effects. In clinical trials, thulium laser has been established to be superior to holmium laser in terms of lithotripsy efficiency, tissue damage, lithotripsy retreating effect, thermal effect, intraoperative visualization, and postoperative lithotripsy-free rate, which is more widely used currently. Among the various pulsed TFLs, QCW TFL provides flexible beam waveform, high electro-optical conversion efficiency, high heat dissipation performance, and low material maintenance requirements. MOPA TFL can flexibly affect the morphology of the output pulse within a wide range while significantly increasing the output power.

Conclusion

TFL represents a safer, more effective and comprehensive tool for the treatment of urinary stone. Although QCW TFL is currently the mainstream laser source for lithotripsy, we anticipate that MOPA technology has the potential to offer number of advantages while it has not yet received sufficient attention. Further studies are still needed to optimize the performance of pulsed TFLs to facilitate the development of thulium laser lithotripsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Similar content being viewed by others

Thulium:YAG laser: a good compromise between holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser for endoscopic lithotripsy? A narrative review

Article 06 November 2023

Thulium Fiber Laser Behavior on Tissue During Upper- and Lower-Tract Endourology

Article 30 September 2022

Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser

Article Open access 06 February 2019

Data Availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper. Additional review data can be shared upon request in Covidence.

References

  1. Kinn, A. C., Fernstrom, I., Johansson, B., et al. (1991). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy—the birth of a new technique. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology,25, 11–14. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Rassweiler, J. (2006). A landmark paper for endourology. European Urology,50(3), 395–399. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaussy, C., Schmiedt, E., Jocham, D., et al. (2017). First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Journal of Urology,197(2), S160–S163. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fried, N. M., & Irby, P. B. (2018). Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy. Nature Reviews Urology,15(9), 563–573. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dretler, S. P. (1988). Laser lithotripsy—a review of 20 years of research and clinical-applications. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine,8(4), 341–356. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pierre, S., & Preminger, G. M. (2007). Holmium laser for stone management. World Journal of Urology,25(3), 235–239. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lerner, L. B., & Tyson, M. D. (2009). Holmium laser applications of the prostate. Urologic Clinics of North America,36(4), 485–495. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Traxer, O., & Keller, E. X. (2020). Thulium fiber laser: The new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World Journal of Urology,38(8), 1883–1894. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Razvi, H. A., Denstedt, J. D., Chun, S. S., et al. (1996). Intracorporeal lithotripsy with the holmium:YAG laser. Journal of Urology,156(3), 912–914. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Teichman, J. M. H., Vassar, G. J., Bishoff, J. T., et al. (1998). Holmium:YAG lithotripsy yields smaller fragments than lithoclast, pulsed dye laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Journal of Urology,159(1), 17–23. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Keller, E. X., de Coninck, V., Audouin, M., et al. (2019). Fragments and dust after holmium laser lithotripsy with or without “Moses technology”: How are they different? Journal of Biophotonics,12(4), e201800227. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kronenberg, P., & Traxer, O. (2015). Update on lasers in urology 2014: Current assessment on holmium:Yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers. World Journal of Urology,33(4), 463–469. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kronenberg, P., & Traxer, O. (2014). The truth about laser fiber diameters. Urology,84(6), 1301–1307. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Emiliani, E., Talso, M., Haddad, M., et al. (2018). The true ablation effect of holmium YAG laser on soft tissue. Journal of Endourology,32(3), 230–235. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Turk, C., Petrik, A., Sarica, K., et al. (2016). EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. European Urology,69(3), 475–482. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Healy, K., Chamsuddin, A., Spivey, J., et al. (2009). Percutaneous endoscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for management of complicated biliary calculi. JSLS-Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons,13(2), 184–189. PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Hardy, L. A., Vinnichenko, V., & Fried, N. M. (2019). High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: Ablation rate and fragment size studies. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine,51(6), 522–530. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan, K. F., Pfefer, T. J., Teichman, J. M. H., et al. (2001). A perspective on laser lithotripsy: The fragmentation processes. Journal of Endourology,15(3), 257–273. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, L. A., Gonzalez, D. A., & Fried, N. M. (2019). Thulium fiber laser ablation of kidney stones using an automated, vibrating fiber. Journal of Biomedical Optics. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.3.038001ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Keller, E. X., de Coninck, V., Doizi, S., et al. (2021). Thulium fiber laser: Ready to dust all urinary stone composition types? World Journal of Urology,39(6), 1693–1698. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kronenberg, P., & Traxer, O. (2019). The laser of the future: Reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review. Translational Andrology and Urology,8, S398–S417. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kronenberg, P., Hameed, B. M. Z., & Somani, B. K. (2021). Outcomes of thulium fibre laser for treatment of urinary tract stones: Results of a systematic review. Current Opinion in Urology,31(2), 80–86. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Andreeva, V., Vinarov, A., Yaroslavsky, I., et al. (2020). Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy. World Journal of Urology,38(2), 497–503. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hardy, L. A., Vinnichenko, V., & Fried, N. M. (2019). High power holmium: YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: Ablation rate and fragment size studies. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine,51(6), 522–530. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Martov, A. G., Ergakov, D. V., Guseynov, M., et al. (2021). Clinical comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser and high-power holmium laser for ureteral stone management. Journal of Endourology,35(6), 795–800. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Proietti, S., Rodríguez-Socarrás, M. E., Eisner, B. H., et al. (2021). Thulium: YAG versus holmium: YAG laser effect on upper urinary tract soft tissue: Evidence from an ex vivo experimental study. Journal of Endourology,35(4), 544–551. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ulvik, Ø., Æsøy, M. S., Juliebø-Jones, P., et al. (2022). Thulium fibre laser versus holmium:YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial. European Urology,82(1), 73–79. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, H., Ryan, R. T., Teichman, J. M. H., et al. (2003). Stone retropulsion during holmium: Yag lithotripsy. Journal of Urology,169(3), 881–885. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Elashry, O. M., & Tawfik, A. M. (2012). Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy. Nature Reviews Urology,9(12), 691–698. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wollin, D. A., Ackerman, A., Yang, C., et al. (2017). Variable pulse duration from a new holmium: YAG laser: The effect on stone comminution, fiber tip degradation, and retropulsion in a dusting model. Urology,103, 47–51. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ventimiglia, E., Doizi, S., Kovalenko, A., et al. (2020). Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium: YAG and super-pulse thulium fibre lasers. BJU international,126(1), 159–167. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Petzold, R., Miernik, A., & Suarez-Ibarrola, R. (2021). Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy—an in vitro study comparing a holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state thulium laser. World Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03668-8ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Dragos, L., Somani, B. K., Etienne, X. K., et al. (2019). Super-pulse thulium fiber versus high power holmium lasers. What about temperature? Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000555251.88486.79ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Taratkin, M., Laukhtina, E., Singla, N., et al. (2020). Temperature changes during laser lithotripsy with Ho:YAG laser and novel Tm-fiber laser: A comparative in-vitro study. World Journal of Urology,38(12), 3261–3266. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Aesoy, M. S., Juliebo-Jones, P., Beisland, C., et al. (2022). Temperature profiles during ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser and holmium:YAG laser: Findings from a pre-clinical study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology,56(4), 313–319. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Andreeva, V., Vinarov, A., Yaroslavsky, I., et al. (2020). Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium: YAG laser for lithotripsy. World Journal of Urology,38, 497–503. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hardy, L. A., Wilson, C. R., Irby, P. B., et al. (2014). Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy in an in vitro ureter model. Journal of Biomedical Optics,19(12), 128001. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Blackmon, R. L., Irby, P. B., & Fried, N. M. (2010). Holmium:YAG (lambda=2,120nm) versus thulium fiber (lambda=1,908nm) laser lithotripsy. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine,42(3), 232–236. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Enikeev, D., Taratkin, M., Klimov, R., et al. (2020). Thulium-fiber laser for lithotripsy: First clinical experience in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World Journal of Urology,38, 3069–3074. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Korolev, D., Akopyan, G., Tsarichenko, D., et al. (2021). Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser. Urolithiasis,49, 485–491. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Traxer, O., & Corrales, M. (2021). Managing urolithiasis with thulium fiber laser: Updated real-life results-a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine,10(15), 3390. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Traxer, O., Sierra, A., & Corrales, M. (2022). Which is the best laser for lithotripsy? Thulium fiber laser. European Urology Open Science,44, 15–17. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang, X., Jin, X. X., Zhou, P., et al. (2015). 105 W ultra-narrowband nanosecond pulsed laser at 2 μm based on monolithic Tm-doped fiber MOPA. Optics Express,23(4), 4233–4241. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang, M., Kelleher, E. J. R., Obraztsova, E. D., et al. (2011). Nanosecond pulse generation in lumped normally dispersive all-fiber mode-locked laser. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters,23(19), 1379–1381. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  45. El-Sherif, A. F., & King, T. A. (2003). High-energy, high-brightness Q-switched TM3+-doped fiber laser using an electro-optic modulator. Optics Communications,218(4–6), 337–344. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  46. Shi, W., Petersen, E. B., Nguyen, D. T., et al. (2011). 220 μJ monolithic single-frequency Q-switched fiber laser at 2 μm by using highly Tm-doped germanate fibers. Optics Letters,36(18), 3575–3577. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Jiang, M., Ma, H. F., Ren, Z. Y., et al. (2013). A graphene Q-switched nanosecond Tm-doped fiber laser at 2 μm. Laser Physics Letters,10(5), 055103. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  48. Li, H. H., Liu, J., Cheng, Z. C., et al. (2015). Pulse-shaping mechanisms in passively mode-locked thulium-doped fiber lasers. Optics Express,23(5), 6292–6303. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sobon, G., Duzynska, A., Swiniarski, M., et al. (2017). CNT-based saturable absorbers with scalable modulation depth for Thulium-doped fiber lasers operating at 1.9 μm. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45491ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Ahmad, H., Samion, M. Z., Kamely, A. A., et al. (2019). Mode-locked thulium doped fiber laser with zinc oxide saturable absorber for 2 μm operation. Infrared Physics & Technology,97, 142–148. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  51. Chernysheva, M. A., Krylov, A. A., Kryukov, P. G., et al. (2012). Nonlinear amplifying loop-mirror-based mode-locked thulium-doped fiber laser. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters,24(14), 1254–1256. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  52. Gene, J., Yeom, D. I., Kim, S. K., et al. (2021). Long-cavity mode-locked thulium-doped fiber laser for high pulse energy. Optics and Laser Technology,136, 106739. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  53. Pal, D., Ghosh, A., Sen, R., et al. (2016). Continuous-wave and quasi-continuous wave thulium-doped all-fiber laser: Implementation on kidney stone fragmentations. Applied Optics,55(23), 6151–6155. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pal, A., Pal, D., Das Chowdhury, S., et al. (2017). All-fiber laser at 1.94 μm: Effect on soft tissue. In Proceedings of the conference on optical interactions with tissue and cells XXVIII, San Francisco, CA, F Jan 30–31, 2017.
  55. Pal, A., Pal, D., Das Chowdhury, S., et al. (2019). Interaction of thulium fiber laser with urinary stone: Effect of laser parameter on fragmented particle size and retropulsion. In Proceedings of the conference on optical interactions with tissue and cells XXX, San Francisco, CA, F Feb 02–03, 2019.
  56. Kwon, I. H., Bae, Y., Yeo, U. C., et al. (2018). Histologic analyses on the response of the skin to 1927 nm fractional thulium fiber laser treatment. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy,20(1), 12–16. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhou, R. L., Ren, J. C., Yang, C., et al. (2013). An all fiber 1.94 μm nanosecond pulse laser amplified by highly Tm 3+ -doped silicon fibers. Chinese Physics Letters,30(5), 054208. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Cheng, X., Li, Z. H., Hou, J., et al. (2016). Gain-switched monolithic fiber laser with ultra-wide tuning range at 2 μm. Optics Express,24(25), 29127–29138. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Grzes, P., & Swiderski, J. (2018). Gain-switched 2 μm fiber laser system providing kilowatt peak-power mode-locked resembling pulses and its application to supercontinuum generation in fluoride fibers. IEEE Photonics Journal,10(1), 1–8. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Ouyang, D. Q., Zhao, J. Q., Zheng, Z. J., et al. (2015). 110 W all fiber actively Q-switched thulium-doped fiber laser. IEEE Photonics Journal,7(1), 1–6. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  61. Pal, D., Paul, A., Das Chowdhury, S., et al. (2018). Hybrid pumped gain-switched thulium fiber laser at a high repetition rate. Applied Optics,57(13), 3546–3550. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Limongelli, J. R., Allee, E., Bieniek, M., et al. (2020). A 564 W QCW thulium fiber oscillator pumped at 793 nm. In Proceedings of the laser congress 2020 (ASSL, LAC), Washington, D.C., F 2020/10/13, 2020. Optica Publishing Group.
  63. IPG Photonics. (2020). IPG photonics corporation. https://www.ipgphotonics.com/en/products/lasers/quasi-cw-fiber-lasers/2-micron-1/tlm-qcw#
  64. Liu, J., Xu, J., Liu, K., et al. (2013). High average power picosecond pulse and supercontinuum generation from a thulium-doped, all-fiber amplifier. Optics Letters,38(20), 4150–4153. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Liu, J., Liu, C., Shi, H. X., et al. (2016). High-power linearly-polarized picosecond thulium-doped all-fiber master-oscillator power-amplifier. Optics Express,24(13), 15005–15011. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Lu, H. B., Zhou, P., Zhang, H. W., et al. (2013). High-power all-fiberized thulium-doped fiber MOPA. Laser Physics Letters,10(12), 125101. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Liu, J., Wang, Q., & Wang, P. (2012). High average power picosecond pulse generation from a thulium-doped all-fiber MOPA system. Optics Express,20(20), 22442–22447. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Swiderski, J., Michalska, M., & Grzes, P. (2019). Mode-locking and self-mode-locking-like operation in a resonantly pumped gain-switched Tm-doped fiber laser. Optics Communications,453, 124406. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  69. Tang, Y. L., & Xu, J. Q. (2012). Hybrid-pumped gain-switched narrow-band thulium fiber laser. Applied Physics Express,5(7), 072702. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. El-Sherif, A. F., & King, T. A. (2003). High-energy, high-brightness Q-switched Tm 3+ -doped fiber laser using an electro-optic modulator. Optics Communications,218(4), 337–344. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  71. Tang, Y., Yu, X., Li, X., et al. (2014). High-power thulium fiber laser Q switched with single-layer graphene. Optics Letters,39(3), 614–617. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Ahmed, M. H. M., Khaleel, W. A., Sadeq, S. A., et al. (2021). Mode-locked thulium doped fiber laser utilizing tungsten trioxide saturable absorber. Optics and Laser Technology,136, 106730. ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
  73. Chua, M. E., Bobrowski, A., Ahmad, I., et al. (2023). Thulium fibre laser vs holmium: Yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis: Meta-analysis of clinical studies. BJU International,131, 383–394. ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the reviewers who participated in the review, as well as MJEditor (www.mjeditor.com) for providing English editing services during the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62075200), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042023kf0113, 2042022gf0004), Key Research and Development Program of Hubei province (2023BCB001), the Translational Medicine and Multidisciplinary Research Project of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (ZNJC202217, ZNJC202232), the Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei Province (2021CFA042).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Institute of Technological Sciences, Wuhan University, #299, Bayi Road, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei, China Runyan Gu, Cheng Lei & Du Wang
  2. Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, #169, East Lake Road, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei, China Zhilong Li, Sheng Li & Xinghuan Wang
  1. Runyan Gu